tradeify

Very good service

Very good service

Amazing first ever propfirm, was not critical on the metrics and really tests your inner trader, as long as you can trade good, you can get pay out, wish they opened up their limits! Customer service was amazing with telling me what steps I was at the entire time, esp thru their ai bot, and if a live person came in the gave an answer that was needed, thank you for making my life easier!

Amazing first ever propfirm, was not critical on the metrics and really tests your inner trader, as long as you can trade good, you can get pay out, wish they opened up their limits! Customer service was amazing with telling me what steps I was at the entire time, esp thru their ai bot, and if a live person came in the gave an answer that was needed, thank you for making my life easier!

The payou matchd alone is something most firms simply can't match,i have gotten same day payout, getting through the evaluation is the only hard task here ,bennypass from telegram passed my own chalenge safely,i got access to funded acount,and have been getting payouts with no stress,

The payou matchd alone is something most firms simply can't match,i have gotten same day payout, getting through the evaluation is the only hard task here ,bennypass from telegram passed my own chalenge safely,i got access to funded acount,and have been getting payouts with no stress,

My experience with this company raised multiple serious concerns regarding execution reliability, fee transparency, and overall accountability. The most critical issue I encountered was a failure in execution. At one point, the platform did not allow me to exit a position when needed. In trading, the ability to manage risk and close positions is fundamental. Not being able to exit a trade exposes users to unnecessary losses and raises major concerns about the stability and reliability of the system. When I raised this issue, I was told that the company does not stand behind third party trading software. However, this is highly concerning because the platform they require users to trade on is entirely based on third party software. If traders are required to execute trades through software provided or mandated by the company, then disclaiming responsibility for that same software creates a clear contradiction. You cannot require users to use a platform while simultaneously refusing to stand behind its performance, especially when execution failures directly impact users financially. For comparison, firms like Topstep stand behind their trading infrastructure and provide a level of accountability when issues arise. That is the standard traders should expect. In addition to execution concerns, the company charges commission fees that are typically associated with live market execution. However, it does not appear that orders are actually being routed to a live exchange. If trading is being conducted in a simulated environment, then charging execution based commissions raises serious questions about how those fees are justified and whether this is being clearly disclosed. There is a clear and important difference between simulated trading and real market execution. When execution issues occur, such as not being able to exit a position, transparency becomes even more critical. Based on my experience, this was not sufficiently clear. I was also unable to find clear information regarding any regulatory registration or licensing tied to the services being offered. Depending on how a firm operates in this space, oversight may fall under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or National Futures Association. The lack of transparency around this raises further concerns about how the business is structured and represented. Overall, the core issue is trust. A trading platform must provide reliable execution, clear disclosures, and accountability for the tools it requires users to rely on. Based on my experience, these standards were not met. I strongly encourage anyone considering this service to do thorough due diligence and fully understand how trades are executed, how fees are applied, and what level of support and accountability is actually provided

My experience with this company raised multiple serious concerns regarding execution reliability, fee transparency, and overall accountability. The most critical issue I encountered was a failure in execution. At one point, the platform did not allow me to exit a position when needed. In trading, the ability to manage risk and close positions is fundamental. Not being able to exit a trade exposes users to unnecessary losses and raises major concerns about the stability and reliability of the system. When I raised this issue, I was told that the company does not stand behind third party trading software. However, this is highly concerning because the platform they require users to trade on is entirely based on third party software. If traders are required to execute trades through software provided or mandated by the company, then disclaiming responsibility for that same software creates a clear contradiction. You cannot require users to use a platform while simultaneously refusing to stand behind its performance, especially when execution failures directly impact users financially. For comparison, firms like Topstep stand behind their trading infrastructure and provide a level of accountability when issues arise. That is the standard traders should expect. In addition to execution concerns, the company charges commission fees that are typically associated with live market execution. However, it does not appear that orders are actually being routed to a live exchange. If trading is being conducted in a simulated environment, then charging execution based commissions raises serious questions about how those fees are justified and whether this is being clearly disclosed. There is a clear and important difference between simulated trading and real market execution. When execution issues occur, such as not being able to exit a position, transparency becomes even more critical. Based on my experience, this was not sufficiently clear. I was also unable to find clear information regarding any regulatory registration or licensing tied to the services being offered. Depending on how a firm operates in this space, oversight may fall under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or National Futures Association. The lack of transparency around this raises further concerns about how the business is structured and represented. Overall, the core issue is trust. A trading platform must provide reliable execution, clear disclosures, and accountability for the tools it requires users to rely on. Based on my experience, these standards were not met. I strongly encourage anyone considering this service to do thorough due diligence and fully understand how trades are executed, how fees are applied, and what level of support and accountability is actually provided

I want to personally recognize Jean for his exceptional support today. I was dealing with a frustrating technical issue, but Jean’s professionalism and expertise turned the entire experience around. He was incredibly patient, listened to my concerns, and didn't stop until we found a perfect solution. It is rare to find a support assistant so dedicated to the customer’s success. Thank you, Jean, for going above and beyond!

I want to personally recognize Jean for his exceptional support today. I was dealing with a frustrating technical issue, but Jean’s professionalism and expertise turned the entire experience around. He was incredibly patient, listened to my concerns, and didn't stop until we found a perfect solution. It is rare to find a support assistant so dedicated to the customer’s success. Thank you, Jean, for going above and beyond!