Account Size
$50K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
4 mini / 40 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$102.2
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$102.2
Consistency Rule
50%
A futures-focused prop firm offering three account paths: Evaluation, Direct (straight to funded, with no evaluation) and Flex, with scaling available beyond the starting sizes. Every account is a one-time fee with no monthly subscription, uses end-of-day drawdown, and pays out every three trading days via Plaid, WorkMarket or crypto. Platforms: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower and TradingView.
170 MyPropFirm · 2999 on Trustpilot
Ends: Oct 31
Ends: Oct 31
Account Size
$50K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
4 mini / 40 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$102.2
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$102.2
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$50K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
4 mini / 40 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$134.4
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$134.4
Consistency Rule
40%
Account Size
$50K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
4 mini / 40 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$116.2
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$116.2
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$50K
Type
Funded
Max Contract
4 mini / 40 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$360.5
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$360.5
Consistency Rule
20%
Account Size
$25K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
2 mini / 20 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$62.3
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$62.3
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$25K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
2 mini / 20 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$86.1
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$86.1
Consistency Rule
40%
Account Size
$25K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
2 mini / 20 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$82.6
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$82.6
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$25K
Type
Funded
Max Contract
2 mini / 20 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$230.3
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$230.3
Consistency Rule
20%
Account Size
$100K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
6 mini / 60 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$205.1
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$205.1
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$100K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
6 mini / 60 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$214.9
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$214.9
Consistency Rule
40%
Account Size
$100K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
6 mini / 60 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$186.9
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$186.9
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$100K
Type
Funded
Max Contract
6 mini / 60 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$490
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$490
Consistency Rule
20%
Account Size
$150K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
10 mini / 100 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$284.9
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$284.9
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$150K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
10 mini / 100 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$287
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$287
Consistency Rule
40%
Account Size
$150K
Type
Challenge
Max Contract
10 mini / 100 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$262.5
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$262.5
Consistency Rule
50%
Account Size
$150K
Type
Funded
Max Contract
10 mini / 100 micro
Drawdown Type
EOD
Challenge Price
$585.2
Activation Fee
$0
Real Cost
$585.2
Consistency Rule
20%
Only title and overall score are required.
Tools our team has verified to work well with Lucid Trading.
Trade copiers that support Lucid Trading accounts.
$750,000
Max Funding
90%
Profit Split
From $89
Challenge Fee
Laurent S
FR • 3/21/2026
As many in the Discord chat (a place for retarded teenagers which does not help though, where the CEO likes to unravel instead of focusing on the seemingly numerous issues of his company), I faced an undue hedging violation sanction, simply due to a (much too common) glitch in the Motive Wave trade copier having lasted around 1 minute, which erased a large winning day and lead me to lose my accounts a few days later. Support did not want to sudy the matter, they keep closing tickets without providing any clear answer to any sort of question, and seem to have a hard time just reading documents and have poor knowledge (of futures trading in general for some, and for other issues the lack of clear firm level policy stance seems to blame). This type of sanction is badly thought out (erasing all gains, not just the ones generated by the factual violation, which can hardly escape their automated monitoring) and just aimed in the trader's disfavour, without any sense of responsibility for their partner platforms. I posted complaints in the Discord too, one directly against the CEO which I qualified as a « teenager », and some days after I strangely got blocked by the age verification procedure of Discord, which was supposed to happen only many months later in the year in my country, a quite stubborn procedure I must say (I have had to send them 3 times the same selfie and the jury is still out to assess if my 40ish face looks like 15 lol)... do my struggles with LT have anything to see with that Discord blockage ? Seems far fetched (but maybe just my using the word teenager would have triggered a flag). I am not decided yet whether to continue with LT, I am quite angry at them and Motive Wave, but trader and prop are at opposing interests until live, I should look for revenge in the form of payout at their expense, but this comment and previous interaction with support and Discord raises the risk of abusive denial, plus neither MW nor Tradesea seem reliable tools at this date, and support is so bad... Finally I can say I have been at TopStep and Bulenox before, and support and the overall experience (including much more mature Discord chat for TopStep) were far better there.
Khalid M
SA • 3/19/2026
ATTENTION EVERY TRADER READING THIS: Lucid Trading is operating with TWO FACES. One face pays people to write good reviews. The other face STEALS from traders and hopes they go away. I am the proof. HARD EVIDENCE (undeniable facts): ✓ I had TWO ACCOUNTS LINKED as a GROUP ✓ Account 1: CLOSED (reason: "Max Loss reached") ✓ Account 2: STILL ACTIVE (trading normally) ✓ Both accounts: LINKED TOGETHER ✓ ACCOUNT 2: NOT A SINGLE DOLLAR LOST – BALANCE COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED QUESTION FOR LUCID TRADING MANAGEMENT: HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? If I reached Max Loss in a GROUP, BOTH accounts die. That's YOUR rule. So either: YOU ARE LYING about the Max Loss reason YOUR SYSTEM IS CRIMINALLY BROKEN YOU PICK ACCOUNTS RANDOMLY TO CLOSE AND KEEP THE MONEY THE KILLER PROOF: My second account is still there. Zero loss. Zero drawdown. Perfectly healthy. If I had actually reached Max Loss in a Group, this account would be gone too. The fact that it's alive means their "Max Loss" claim is FABRICATED. WHAT HAPPENED WHEN I ASKED FOR A MANUAL REVIEW? NOTHING. I contacted support. Showed them the proof. Explained the contradiction. Asked for a simple human to look at my accounts. THEY CLOSED MY TICKET. No explanation. No investigation. No apology. NOTHING. THIS IS A PATTERN OF THEFT: Attract traders with "legit" reputation Automated system flags accounts randomly Give a fake reason that sounds technical ("Max Loss") When trader proves it's wrong → IGNORE KEEP THE MONEY TO EVERYONE READING: Do not trust the 5-star reviews. Do not trust their website. Look at the 1-star reviews. Look at how MANY traders report the same story: ❌ Account closed for "no reason" ❌ Support ignores proof ❌ Money disappears LUCID TRADING IS NOT A PROP FIRM. IT IS A THEFT OPERATION DRESSED AS A PROP FIRM. MY DEMAND: Return my account or give me a REAL manual review with a REAL human who can explain how ONE linked account dies, the other lives, AND THE LIVING ACCOUNT HAS ZERO DAMAGE. You cannot. Because there is NO explanation. Because you STOLE it. TO TRUSTPILOT: I am posting this with REAL PROOF. If they report this, ask them to explain the contradiction. Ask them to show you how one linked account can die, the other survive, and the surviving account show zero loss. They CAN'T. Because this review is 100% FACT. LUCID TRADING = ORGANIZED THEFT. SPREAD THIS REVIEW. SHARE IT EVERYWHERE. WARN OTHERS.
customer
IN • 3/19/2026
Don't go with fake reviews when it comes to support it is worst ... I took 25k flex account..I placed trades running in profits and i accidentally removed it from dashboard I requested them to give it back they denied saying it's permanently removed ...then I purchased another 50k account and placed trades ..next day I get email next day I violated because of hedging ..basically even after removing permanently..25k account trades are running in background(which will run endlessly ) which violated my 50k active account ..
Billy Raymond
US • 3/18/2026
I was never informed of any breach or warned that my account was at risk. There were no notices or indications that my trading violated any rules. But as soon as I requested a payout, they suddenly claimed a breach, blocked my account, and denied the payout. I take a careful approach these days, and it seems to be paying off on #century 100 .I've had a good run and my payments were processed.
Dakota barlament
US • 3/18/2026
I was using lucid early on, right when they integrated projectx, it was great, support/help, everything. Just came back after a while of trying other firms and decided to try tradesea, had multiple significant issues. Reach out to lucid support, they tell me, you have to reach out to tradesea ( I paid lucid not tradesea) so I do and then go into tradeseas discord and see a ton of people saying they basically don’t answer tickets. Such a simple solution that lucid could have taken care of in a couple minutes. Instead they’ve decided to have worse support than topstep