My Funded Futures

Update: I will say that MFF completely does not care about the customer. I have never gotten a response on the ban for multiple profiles. What they did do was kick me off of discord, blank out my chat with support, and never reply to my emails. I would be so much happier if they would just say look you did nothing wrong but your banned with us, but to do it and make some fake excuse up is a SCAM. I won an account last week on the Youtube stream. I never received it so i contacted support. Instead of being issued the free account I was banned by Hannah with the following reply by her: "Following a review conducted by our Risk team, we have identified activity on your profile that violates the Simulated Trader Agreement (the “Agreement”) and our trading rules.​ Our review confirmed the presence of multiple profiles within our system. Please note that all accounts must be registered and operated strictly under the account holder’s own legal name. Using or operating accounts under another person’s name constitutes a breach of our Terms of Service. The Appendix of the Agreement strictly prohibits any form of coordinated, mirrored, or shared trading activity between users (“No coordinated trading or mirrored strategies across accounts”). These requirements also align with our public Fair Play Policy, which prohibits coordinated or shared trading activity between traders.​ In accordance with the Agreement, MyFundedFutures may terminate access when rule violations occur (“The Company may immediately terminate this Agreement if it believes the Trader has breached the Agreement or violated the Rules” — Simulated Trader Agreement, Section 6.1). We appreciate the time you spent with MyFundedFutures and wish you the best in your future trading endeavors." I have never had any other profile with them. I asked for clarity and for specifics of which other "profile" they had for me which was not provided at all. So I got a reply back 2 days later which said the following: "Our Risk Team has carefully reviewed this and after further consideration, we regret to inform you that we are not able to provide our services to you at this time. This decision is final, and we will not be able to offer any further purchases to our platform. We understand this may not be the outcome you were hoping for, and we appreciate your understanding in this matter. We sincerely thank you for your time with MyFundedFutures and wish you the very best in your future trading endeavors." Best regards, Risk Team MyFundedFutures Hannah MyFundedFutures Once again no specifics given by Hannah or Gabrielo only to say that I am banned. To say a little about myself with the firm....I have been a live trader with them last October and have always been a loyal customer with almost no issues raised by my end. I find it very DISSAPOINTING that it feels as though My Funded Futures really doesn't care if they are right or not in this case. I am just another user for them what does it matter to them if they ban me. It just feels like a made up reason to ban me. I am not unprofitable with the firm I am net positive in the years I have traded with them. Does not seem right to me.

Update: I will say that MFF completely does not care about the customer. I have never gotten a response on the ban for multiple profiles. What they did do was kick me off of discord, blank out my chat with support, and never reply to my emails. I would be so much happier if they would just say look you did nothing wrong but your banned with us, but to do it and make some fake excuse up is a SCAM. I won an account last week on the Youtube stream. I never received it so i contacted support. Instead of being issued the free account I was banned by Hannah with the following reply by her: "Following a review conducted by our Risk team, we have identified activity on your profile that violates the Simulated Trader Agreement (the “Agreement”) and our trading rules.​ Our review confirmed the presence of multiple profiles within our system. Please note that all accounts must be registered and operated strictly under the account holder’s own legal name. Using or operating accounts under another person’s name constitutes a breach of our Terms of Service. The Appendix of the Agreement strictly prohibits any form of coordinated, mirrored, or shared trading activity between users (“No coordinated trading or mirrored strategies across accounts”). These requirements also align with our public Fair Play Policy, which prohibits coordinated or shared trading activity between traders.​ In accordance with the Agreement, MyFundedFutures may terminate access when rule violations occur (“The Company may immediately terminate this Agreement if it believes the Trader has breached the Agreement or violated the Rules” — Simulated Trader Agreement, Section 6.1). We appreciate the time you spent with MyFundedFutures and wish you the best in your future trading endeavors." I have never had any other profile with them. I asked for clarity and for specifics of which other "profile" they had for me which was not provided at all. So I got a reply back 2 days later which said the following: "Our Risk Team has carefully reviewed this and after further consideration, we regret to inform you that we are not able to provide our services to you at this time. This decision is final, and we will not be able to offer any further purchases to our platform. We understand this may not be the outcome you were hoping for, and we appreciate your understanding in this matter. We sincerely thank you for your time with MyFundedFutures and wish you the very best in your future trading endeavors." Best regards, Risk Team MyFundedFutures Hannah MyFundedFutures Once again no specifics given by Hannah or Gabrielo only to say that I am banned. To say a little about myself with the firm....I have been a live trader with them last October and have always been a loyal customer with almost no issues raised by my end. I find it very DISSAPOINTING that it feels as though My Funded Futures really doesn't care if they are right or not in this case. I am just another user for them what does it matter to them if they ban me. It just feels like a made up reason to ban me. I am not unprofitable with the firm I am net positive in the years I have traded with them. Does not seem right to me.

The only prop firm I’ve ever had issues with. I experienced serious errors, including sudden order closures and market orders disappearing, and according to them, nothing had happened. I will never purchase from them again. I’ve been a profitable trader for years with all the most well-known prop firms.

The only prop firm I’ve ever had issues with. I experienced serious errors, including sudden order closures and market orders disappearing, and according to them, nothing had happened. I will never purchase from them again. I’ve been a profitable trader for years with all the most well-known prop firms.

I was trading a $50K evaluation account with a maximum limit of 5 mini contracts. In my case, I already had an open position of 3 (SELL) contracts. I then placed a stop-loss order (Buy to Cover 3 contracts) intended strictly to close that existing position. However, the system treated this as if I was attempting to increase exposure beyond the 5-contract limit, resulting in the order being rejected. From a trading perspective, this was not an attempt to exceed the account limit, but simply a standard risk management action to close an existing position. The issue appears to be how the platform interprets stop/exit orders in relation to contract limits. Support confirmed the rejection was due to exceeding the 5-contract limit and stated that execution is handled by Tradovate. However, there was no clear explanation of why a closing order was treated as additional exposure in the system logic. While I understand the importance of strict risk rules in prop accounts, the lack of clarity around how closing orders interact with contract limits can lead to confusion and unintended rejections. Apparently in their system math: 3 + 3 = 6 3 - 3 = 6 Makes perfect sense…

I was trading a $50K evaluation account with a maximum limit of 5 mini contracts. In my case, I already had an open position of 3 (SELL) contracts. I then placed a stop-loss order (Buy to Cover 3 contracts) intended strictly to close that existing position. However, the system treated this as if I was attempting to increase exposure beyond the 5-contract limit, resulting in the order being rejected. From a trading perspective, this was not an attempt to exceed the account limit, but simply a standard risk management action to close an existing position. The issue appears to be how the platform interprets stop/exit orders in relation to contract limits. Support confirmed the rejection was due to exceeding the 5-contract limit and stated that execution is handled by Tradovate. However, there was no clear explanation of why a closing order was treated as additional exposure in the system logic. While I understand the importance of strict risk rules in prop accounts, the lack of clarity around how closing orders interact with contract limits can lead to confusion and unintended rejections. Apparently in their system math: 3 + 3 = 6 3 - 3 = 6 Makes perfect sense…

At first, kyc is approved, 6-7 months trading and burning accounts, nothing flagged, all good, In april passed accounts, upgraded to funded, nothing flagged,no voilations, at time of payout, payout rejected with 5 month old data in voilations that too provided in response to Tx AG but not in requests of consumers,that data too miss many info ( multiple profile proof, fraud committed proof, exit entry price proof,independant trade log and many more ) and this is the response i got blocked on discord Justice will be served.Every one who is being affected by false accusations may file complaint at Tx AG Consumer Protection Division​/ Tx state securities board as both are reviewing and investigating the Deceptive Trade Practice Act Voilations by decieving global consumers and deny payouts( official letters will be provided to Trust Pilot team for confirmation).Exposing My Funded Futures,LLC While marketing a "Global Business Address" in Delaware ( proof attached), the Delaware Dept. of Justice (IPU) has confirmed this is merely a registered agent & NOT a physical office for legal matters.All traders who have been affected should file complaint at Tx AG consumer protection division for justice. The Delaware DOJ stated this case falls under Texas jurisdiction. This deceptive setup triggers multiple Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) violations for misguiding global consumers: ⚖️ DTPA Sec. 17.46(b)(4): Using deceptive designations of geographic origin. ⚖️ DTPA Sec. 17.46(b)(24): Failing to disclose material information (true location) to induce traders into agreements. As Per @TXAG standards, a legitimate business must have a physical location it is not trying to conceal. Thank you to the Texas Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division @KenPaxtonTX @TXAG and TSSB for their attention to these violations. UPDATE FORMAL LEGAL & REGULATORY ACTION INITIATED I am accused of Fraud,, wrong information provided even kyc verified,, mislead info and multiple accounts??? What about your mislead info to customers?? You have provided 108 Lake land ave ,Delaware while DOJ investor protection unit deny that physical office does not exist?? I will provide that letter to trustpilot as well so that all traders facing issues should contact officially and legally to concerened address. ​I have officially moved this dispute into the legal and regulatory phase after the firm's serious false accusations and payout rejections with failure to address and resolute the dispute ​AAA Arbitration: Case filed regarding the withheld $11,988 payout and serious accusations with accounts closure. ​Texas Attorney General (OAG): Complaint filed in Consumer Protection Division for unfair business practices and payout denial. ​BBB Dispute: Complaint filed pending response from the firm. ​Delaware Investor Protection: Official report filed. FTC - complaint filed CFTC - complaint filed CME group - complaint filed ​TECHNICAL REBUTTAL: I have provided all agencies with forensic trade logs,execution deltas and price variances with different P&L that mathematically disprove "mirror trading" , copy or fraud identity allegations. I have also submitted full identity verification and selfie-checks to disprove "linked account" claims. ​Traders should exercise extreme caution i will provide all data to Trust pilot team as well : automated flags are being used here to block valid payouts even when independent execution is proven wife is denied of a payout just because his husband also uses this firm..accused of account sharing with other person or managing other person account.no copy trading no device sharing no ip rule o hedge trading and trading also in different time period. But still denied as my name linked with husband name..requested im willing to provide any thing needed but...its injustice

At first, kyc is approved, 6-7 months trading and burning accounts, nothing flagged, all good, In april passed accounts, upgraded to funded, nothing flagged,no voilations, at time of payout, payout rejected with 5 month old data in voilations that too provided in response to Tx AG but not in requests of consumers,that data too miss many info ( multiple profile proof, fraud committed proof, exit entry price proof,independant trade log and many more ) and this is the response i got blocked on discord Justice will be served.Every one who is being affected by false accusations may file complaint at Tx AG Consumer Protection Division​/ Tx state securities board as both are reviewing and investigating the Deceptive Trade Practice Act Voilations by decieving global consumers and deny payouts( official letters will be provided to Trust Pilot team for confirmation).Exposing My Funded Futures,LLC While marketing a "Global Business Address" in Delaware ( proof attached), the Delaware Dept. of Justice (IPU) has confirmed this is merely a registered agent & NOT a physical office for legal matters.All traders who have been affected should file complaint at Tx AG consumer protection division for justice. The Delaware DOJ stated this case falls under Texas jurisdiction. This deceptive setup triggers multiple Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) violations for misguiding global consumers: ⚖️ DTPA Sec. 17.46(b)(4): Using deceptive designations of geographic origin. ⚖️ DTPA Sec. 17.46(b)(24): Failing to disclose material information (true location) to induce traders into agreements. As Per @TXAG standards, a legitimate business must have a physical location it is not trying to conceal. Thank you to the Texas Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division @KenPaxtonTX @TXAG and TSSB for their attention to these violations. UPDATE FORMAL LEGAL & REGULATORY ACTION INITIATED I am accused of Fraud,, wrong information provided even kyc verified,, mislead info and multiple accounts??? What about your mislead info to customers?? You have provided 108 Lake land ave ,Delaware while DOJ investor protection unit deny that physical office does not exist?? I will provide that letter to trustpilot as well so that all traders facing issues should contact officially and legally to concerened address. ​I have officially moved this dispute into the legal and regulatory phase after the firm's serious false accusations and payout rejections with failure to address and resolute the dispute ​AAA Arbitration: Case filed regarding the withheld $11,988 payout and serious accusations with accounts closure. ​Texas Attorney General (OAG): Complaint filed in Consumer Protection Division for unfair business practices and payout denial. ​BBB Dispute: Complaint filed pending response from the firm. ​Delaware Investor Protection: Official report filed. FTC - complaint filed CFTC - complaint filed CME group - complaint filed ​TECHNICAL REBUTTAL: I have provided all agencies with forensic trade logs,execution deltas and price variances with different P&L that mathematically disprove "mirror trading" , copy or fraud identity allegations. I have also submitted full identity verification and selfie-checks to disprove "linked account" claims. ​Traders should exercise extreme caution i will provide all data to Trust pilot team as well : automated flags are being used here to block valid payouts even when independent execution is proven wife is denied of a payout just because his husband also uses this firm..accused of account sharing with other person or managing other person account.no copy trading no device sharing no ip rule o hedge trading and trading also in different time period. But still denied as my name linked with husband name..requested im willing to provide any thing needed but...its injustice

SCAM execution & Technical failure: Support (Emmanuel) admits error but refuses fix! ​ ​"Warning to all traders: MyFundedFutures has a serious execution bridge issue and their support is a joke. ​During my session, their bridge REJECTED my protective Stop Loss (Order ending in ...187). Instead of protecting my capital, I was hit with a 'Ghost Fill' at 26673.50, while the actual market low was 26690.25. That is a 17-point discrepancy caused by their server failure, not the market. ​I provided the full Audit Trail and video evidence. Support Lead 'Emmanuel' explicitly admitted in writing that there was a 'technical variance' of $600, yet he flat-out refuses to reset the account or acknowledge their technical failure. This is effectively stealing a funded account through server incompetence. ​If you value your capital, stay away. They admit their tech fails, but they force the trader to pay for the damage. I have documented everything publicly on X (@jeffrey_trades). ​Account ID: MFFUEVPRO567400010 I demand a full reset of my account due to this proven server error!"

SCAM execution & Technical failure: Support (Emmanuel) admits error but refuses fix! ​ ​"Warning to all traders: MyFundedFutures has a serious execution bridge issue and their support is a joke. ​During my session, their bridge REJECTED my protective Stop Loss (Order ending in ...187). Instead of protecting my capital, I was hit with a 'Ghost Fill' at 26673.50, while the actual market low was 26690.25. That is a 17-point discrepancy caused by their server failure, not the market. ​I provided the full Audit Trail and video evidence. Support Lead 'Emmanuel' explicitly admitted in writing that there was a 'technical variance' of $600, yet he flat-out refuses to reset the account or acknowledge their technical failure. This is effectively stealing a funded account through server incompetence. ​If you value your capital, stay away. They admit their tech fails, but they force the trader to pay for the damage. I have documented everything publicly on X (@jeffrey_trades). ​Account ID: MFFUEVPRO567400010 I demand a full reset of my account due to this proven server error!"