FundedNext Futures

This people are not genuine at all they tell you that their maximum daily losses is 2% but you you will be at 1% draw down they will breach the account these people are nothing but scammers they are scammers they are not true they will make you feel that they are true,this is for 5k account.the account they also manipulate your trades I have screenshot of all these things and video record while I'm trading with this account these people are manipulating trades like yeah I'm just,so I bought a 5K challenge and then pass it now when I want to now make profit you should see what they did I have the screenshots and record of all this.

This people are not genuine at all they tell you that their maximum daily losses is 2% but you you will be at 1% draw down they will breach the account these people are nothing but scammers they are scammers they are not true they will make you feel that they are true,this is for 5k account.the account they also manipulate your trades I have screenshot of all these things and video record while I'm trading with this account these people are manipulating trades like yeah I'm just,so I bought a 5K challenge and then pass it now when I want to now make profit you should see what they did I have the screenshots and record of all this.

1:Too heigh spreads 2: I bought 10k account and my account had breached on 373$ loss instead of 400$. 3: IP issue too matter 4: SL is mandatory within 3min

1:Too heigh spreads 2: I bought 10k account and my account had breached on 373$ loss instead of 400$. 3: IP issue too matter 4: SL is mandatory within 3min

I passed both phases of a FundedNext Stellar Lite 2-Step $100k challenge and was in the 21-day cycle before first withdrawal. On April 21, 2026, my funded account (11875496) was terminated for a "repeat margin usage breach." Here is what actually happened — all facts verifiable in their own trade logs and emails. The first warning arrived AFTER I had already passed both phases: On April 13, FundedNext issued a formal warning on my Phase 2 Challenge account (11867541) for exceeding a 70% cumulative margin threshold. The warning arrived after I had already completed the Phase 2 profit target. I had no opportunity to adjust my strategy during the challenge because the rule was not flagged until both phases were already passed. I acknowledged the rules going forward and was told Phase 2 was approved. The two trades cited in the termination (April 17): Trade 1: 0.5 lot XAUUSD sell, opened 16:11:40. Stop-Loss and Take-Profit both set. Held ~6 hours. Closed +$1,020. At-time margin: 48.78%. Trade 2: 0.5 lot XAUUSD sell, opened 16:24:31. No Stop-Loss. No Take-Profit. Closed manually 88 seconds later at -$126. Structurally this is what an accidental mobile entry looks like — tapped, noticed, closed within a minute and a half. Alone, 48.58% margin. The 97.56% margin figure they cited as the basis for termination only exists because these two positions were briefly open at the same time. Neither trade individually breached their threshold. Termination came AFTER five more days of profitable trading: Between April 17 and April 21, I continued trading the funded account and produced additional profit. FundedNext issued no real-time margin alert, no warning, no communication at the time of the trade. The termination email arrived approximately five days later, after I had already built up Performance Reward expectation — all of which was voided. The appeal and their response: I submitted a detailed appeal showing Trade 2 was structurally accidental (no SL, no TP, 88-second duration, immediate manual close). I requested: (a) The specific published clause defining "margin usage" as a numeric breach. (b) The URL where this rule is published for traders to review before purchase. (c) Which specific entry from their Prohibited Strategies FAQ applies. (d) The full text of the April 13 warning. Their response addressed none of these points. Instead they claimed the trades were "13 minutes apart" and therefore "not accidental." That's the gap between the two opens — not the duration of the disputed trade, which was 88 seconds. They referred to "internal policies" as the source of record. Internal policies are not the same as published rules a trader can review before purchase. What traders should know before buying a challenge: 1. Margin warnings can be issued retroactively, after phases are already passed — with no chance to adjust during the challenge. 2. Terminations can arrive days after the alleged incident, with no real-time alert. You may build profit in the meantime that is then voided. 3. Margin thresholds are not clearly specified in the public rule framework at time of purchase. Enforcement can escalate to termination without the numeric threshold being cited in writing. 4. Warnings are cumulative across all accounts under your ownership — current and future. 5. Accidental entries (88-second fat-fingers with no SL, no TP, immediate manual close) are treated identically to planned trades. 6. Their re-evaluation process does not substantively engage with specific trade-level arguments. The outcome: Account terminated. No refund. No reinstatement. Challenge fee forfeited. Five days of post-incident trading profit voided. The April 17 session itself closed net positive at +$894. Document everything. Save every email. Screenshot your trade history.

I passed both phases of a FundedNext Stellar Lite 2-Step $100k challenge and was in the 21-day cycle before first withdrawal. On April 21, 2026, my funded account (11875496) was terminated for a "repeat margin usage breach." Here is what actually happened — all facts verifiable in their own trade logs and emails. The first warning arrived AFTER I had already passed both phases: On April 13, FundedNext issued a formal warning on my Phase 2 Challenge account (11867541) for exceeding a 70% cumulative margin threshold. The warning arrived after I had already completed the Phase 2 profit target. I had no opportunity to adjust my strategy during the challenge because the rule was not flagged until both phases were already passed. I acknowledged the rules going forward and was told Phase 2 was approved. The two trades cited in the termination (April 17): Trade 1: 0.5 lot XAUUSD sell, opened 16:11:40. Stop-Loss and Take-Profit both set. Held ~6 hours. Closed +$1,020. At-time margin: 48.78%. Trade 2: 0.5 lot XAUUSD sell, opened 16:24:31. No Stop-Loss. No Take-Profit. Closed manually 88 seconds later at -$126. Structurally this is what an accidental mobile entry looks like — tapped, noticed, closed within a minute and a half. Alone, 48.58% margin. The 97.56% margin figure they cited as the basis for termination only exists because these two positions were briefly open at the same time. Neither trade individually breached their threshold. Termination came AFTER five more days of profitable trading: Between April 17 and April 21, I continued trading the funded account and produced additional profit. FundedNext issued no real-time margin alert, no warning, no communication at the time of the trade. The termination email arrived approximately five days later, after I had already built up Performance Reward expectation — all of which was voided. The appeal and their response: I submitted a detailed appeal showing Trade 2 was structurally accidental (no SL, no TP, 88-second duration, immediate manual close). I requested: (a) The specific published clause defining "margin usage" as a numeric breach. (b) The URL where this rule is published for traders to review before purchase. (c) Which specific entry from their Prohibited Strategies FAQ applies. (d) The full text of the April 13 warning. Their response addressed none of these points. Instead they claimed the trades were "13 minutes apart" and therefore "not accidental." That's the gap between the two opens — not the duration of the disputed trade, which was 88 seconds. They referred to "internal policies" as the source of record. Internal policies are not the same as published rules a trader can review before purchase. What traders should know before buying a challenge: 1. Margin warnings can be issued retroactively, after phases are already passed — with no chance to adjust during the challenge. 2. Terminations can arrive days after the alleged incident, with no real-time alert. You may build profit in the meantime that is then voided. 3. Margin thresholds are not clearly specified in the public rule framework at time of purchase. Enforcement can escalate to termination without the numeric threshold being cited in writing. 4. Warnings are cumulative across all accounts under your ownership — current and future. 5. Accidental entries (88-second fat-fingers with no SL, no TP, immediate manual close) are treated identically to planned trades. 6. Their re-evaluation process does not substantively engage with specific trade-level arguments. The outcome: Account terminated. No refund. No reinstatement. Challenge fee forfeited. Five days of post-incident trading profit voided. The April 17 session itself closed net positive at +$894. Document everything. Save every email. Screenshot your trade history.